USSDR Blog Banner

50K Awarded to Colorado Couple After HOA Refused to Allow Their Emotional Support Animal

50K Awarded to Colorado Couple After HOA Refused to Allow Their Emotional Support Animal

Anup No Comments January 10, 2020
blog title

This week a court-ordered The Creekside Condominium Homeowner’s Association of Snowmass Village to pay $50,000 to a homeowner after the HOA failed to allow a her emotional support dog, a violation of the Fair Housing Act, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said Thursday.

This past Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Daniel Domenico for the District of Colorado, ordered a consent order that resolved the years-long dispute between the Creekside HOA and both Jason Neilson, a longtime Creekside owner, and his domestic partner Kirsten Swick over whether Swick’s emotional support dog met the HOA’s criteria for reasonable accommodation to its “no dogs” policy.

In addition to paying the $50,000 in compensation to Neilson and Swick, the three-year consent order requires the Creekside HOA board to undergo annual Fair Housing Act training and adopt a new reasonable accommodation policy and guidelines, along with an animal assistance policy.

“Housing providers are required by law to make reasonable accommodations for individuals with service dogs and emotional support dogs,” U.S. Attorney Jason Dunn for the District of Colorado said in a news release sent Thursday. “We are pleased that this HOA is adopting policies and will conduct training that complies with the Fair Housing Act. These are important protections to ensure that individuals with disabilities have equal housing opportunities.”

The Creekside HOA board had no comment Thursday as board protocol requires it meet as a whole before issuing any statement, according to a board member. Neilson and Swick could not be reached for comment Thursday.

Court documents show that the Creekside HOA board’s violation of the Fair Housing Act started in December 2016 when Neilson and Swick made a request for Swick to be granted reasonable accommodation for her emotional support dog. The couple followed Federal Law and provided the HOA board a letter from a licensed psychologist requesting accommodation for the emotional support dog to assist her with depression and anxiety.

The Creekside HOA board rejected the initial letter submitted in December 2016 a violation of Federal Law, stating it did not “meet legitimate requirements,” court documents say. The HOA board requested verification of Swick’s disability and need for an emotional support animal.

From January 2017 to June 2017, Swick and Neilson continued to apply for reasonable accommodation with Creekside HOA but were unable to get approval from the board. Over the course of the year they stayed at five different residences with friends and relatives and spent more than a week living out of their van so Swick could keep her emotional support dog and avoid being fined, the complaint says.

Swick and Neilson submitted additional documentation attributed to two separate medical providers over the five months. The documents described Swick’s depression and anxiety, treatment, and how an emotional support dog could benefit her.

The HOA board rejected the additional documents, stating they were too vague or insufficient, according to the federal district court complaint. They informed the couple they had to pay $3,650 in fines or else a lien would be placed on Neilson’s unit.

After Nielson hire an attorney in June 14, 2017, the Creekside HOA board reversed course and granted Neilson and Swick’s request for accommodation after the couple’s attorney informed the HOA board they were preparing to sue in federal district court.

Regardless, Neilson and Swick filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Division at the end of June 2017.

Two months later, the Creekside HOA board requested $500 from each condo owner “to cover legal costs and potential liability arising from the Board’s enforcement of the Association’s ‘No Dog’ rule,” court documents state.

HUD’s “Charge of Discrimination,” resulted in a civil action complaint filed in U.S. District Court and the consent order between the court and Creekside HOA was approved Tuesday.

The Creekside HOA has 10 days from the approval date to pay $50,000 in compensation to Nielson and Swick; 15 days to distribute its new reasonable accommodation and assistance animal policies to Creekside tenants; and 30 days to notify all homeowners of the lawsuit and to issue an apology to Neilson and Swick via email.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Preloader
X
SERVICE DOG ID CARD USA Service Animal Registration Your Service Dog ID card will include our convenient QR Code for a quick scan link to our registry lookup. By simply entering your dog\'s registration number your official registered profile will be accessible for quick verification in the event the validity of your service dog is ever questioned. 2054
$29.99
Product Image
5 12230
Awesome - very helpful & arrived quickly - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Awesome - very helpful & arrived quickly
- by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Service Excellence - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Outstanding website, easy to move from screen to screen. Provided me with the opportunity to see exactly what Liam needs as a service dog.
Did not receive my letter - by , March 25, 2011
1/ 1stars
Did not receive it what do ever. Don’t know if it include letter for both housing and traveling. Waiting for a long time for consultation.
Emotional Support Registration - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Quick and easy. Will definitely let those folks who need to, contact your service! Thank you for the no stress experience. This means so much to me.
- by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
It was, great, it always been
Love this site - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Great, easy to learn the specifics, and to purchase.
- by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
I’m so happy I was able to find a program that met everything I was looking for!!
Psychiatric Service Dog Travel Letter - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
The overall experience was remarkably easy I simply followed the steps presented, it went from step to step, and my computer skills are challenged, and yet I finished within minutes.
Psychiatric Service Dog Travel Letter - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
The overall experience was remarkably easy I simply followed the steps presented, it went from step to step, and my computer skills are challenged, and yet I finished within minutes.
Awesome - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
The best...its first time when I make this...
Thank You - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
I have put off doing this because I thought it would be time consuming. I was wrong. It was easy and timely.
Registration - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Very user friendly site
Thanks - by , March 25, 2011
4/ 4stars
I was needed to do it 3 times. It didn’t work in the beginning, everything else was fine and OK. Thank you.
No letter - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Haven't received my letter
Awesome - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Your product will have added an excellent lifetime change for me by allowing me to bring my dog with me everywhere. Thank you
Excellent Service - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Very user friendly and prompt service. Highly recommend
Too small - by , March 25, 2011
3/ 3stars
My dog's weight falls in the range for M vest but it was ended up to be too small
Service dog registration - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Great service and website, perfect for the dog I have been training for my stroke. Highly recommend them and there products thanks for your help.
Satisfied - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
I am very happy with my experience I am not capable of doing internet due to my medical condition, the girl who helped me was very caring and willing to help. I would highly recommend them because they are here to help the disabled. Thank you