USSDR Blog Banner

50K Awarded to Colorado Couple After HOA Refused to Allow Their Emotional Support Animal

50K Awarded to Colorado Couple After HOA Refused to Allow Their Emotional Support Animal

Anup No Comments January 10, 2020
blog title

This week a court-ordered The Creekside Condominium Homeowner’s Association of Snowmass Village to pay $50,000 to a homeowner after the HOA failed to allow a her emotional support dog, a violation of the Fair Housing Act, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said Thursday.

This past Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Daniel Domenico for the District of Colorado, ordered a consent order that resolved the years-long dispute between the Creekside HOA and both Jason Neilson, a longtime Creekside owner, and his domestic partner Kirsten Swick over whether Swick’s emotional support dog met the HOA’s criteria for reasonable accommodation to its “no dogs” policy.

In addition to paying the $50,000 in compensation to Neilson and Swick, the three-year consent order requires the Creekside HOA board to undergo annual Fair Housing Act training and adopt a new reasonable accommodation policy and guidelines, along with an animal assistance policy.

“Housing providers are required by law to make reasonable accommodations for individuals with service dogs and emotional support dogs,” U.S. Attorney Jason Dunn for the District of Colorado said in a news release sent Thursday. “We are pleased that this HOA is adopting policies and will conduct training that complies with the Fair Housing Act. These are important protections to ensure that individuals with disabilities have equal housing opportunities.”

The Creekside HOA board had no comment Thursday as board protocol requires it meet as a whole before issuing any statement, according to a board member. Neilson and Swick could not be reached for comment Thursday.

Court documents show that the Creekside HOA board’s violation of the Fair Housing Act started in December 2016 when Neilson and Swick made a request for Swick to be granted reasonable accommodation for her emotional support dog. The couple followed Federal Law and provided the HOA board a letter from a licensed psychologist requesting accommodation for the emotional support dog to assist her with depression and anxiety.

The Creekside HOA board rejected the initial letter submitted in December 2016 a violation of Federal Law, stating it did not “meet legitimate requirements,” court documents say. The HOA board requested verification of Swick’s disability and need for an emotional support animal.

From January 2017 to June 2017, Swick and Neilson continued to apply for reasonable accommodation with Creekside HOA but were unable to get approval from the board. Over the course of the year they stayed at five different residences with friends and relatives and spent more than a week living out of their van so Swick could keep her emotional support dog and avoid being fined, the complaint says.

Swick and Neilson submitted additional documentation attributed to two separate medical providers over the five months. The documents described Swick’s depression and anxiety, treatment, and how an emotional support dog could benefit her.

The HOA board rejected the additional documents, stating they were too vague or insufficient, according to the federal district court complaint. They informed the couple they had to pay $3,650 in fines or else a lien would be placed on Neilson’s unit.

After Nielson hire an attorney in June 14, 2017, the Creekside HOA board reversed course and granted Neilson and Swick’s request for accommodation after the couple’s attorney informed the HOA board they were preparing to sue in federal district court.

Regardless, Neilson and Swick filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Division at the end of June 2017.

Two months later, the Creekside HOA board requested $500 from each condo owner “to cover legal costs and potential liability arising from the Board’s enforcement of the Association’s ‘No Dog’ rule,” court documents state.

HUD’s “Charge of Discrimination,” resulted in a civil action complaint filed in U.S. District Court and the consent order between the court and Creekside HOA was approved Tuesday.

The Creekside HOA has 10 days from the approval date to pay $50,000 in compensation to Nielson and Swick; 15 days to distribute its new reasonable accommodation and assistance animal policies to Creekside tenants; and 30 days to notify all homeowners of the lawsuit and to issue an apology to Neilson and Swick via email.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Preloader
X
SERVICE DOG ID CARD USA Service Animal Registration Your Service Dog ID card will include our convenient QR Code for a quick scan link to our registry lookup. By simply entering your dog\'s registration number your official registered profile will be accessible for quick verification in the event the validity of your service dog is ever questioned. 2054
$29.99
Product Image
5 10570
Digital certificate didn’t arrive - by , March 25, 2011
2/ 2stars
It is a very confusing process, I still haven’t received email providing me with my dog’s digital ID information. Website is not user friendly
Lexi - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Great. Thank you.
excelent product-- - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Vest was too tight on dog-- saw there was no problems with your Co.. for returns and just mailed it back for a lg. size thank you
Jacket too small - by , March 25, 2011
4/ 4stars
Jacket way smaller than described
Perfect fit for tiny toy puppy - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
I did not believe it could possibly fit my less than 4 lb. puppy but it is adjustable and fits well. Thanks!
Great Vest - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Measurements were correct. It fits my dog great.
Absolutely perfect - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Easy, we'll put together. I've spread the word about this company to friends and family. The card was neatly printed and well put together and it fits perfectly into my wallet. As my pup grows we will continue to purchase she things here. Thank you!
Paquete incompleto - by , March 25, 2011
1/ 1stars
Me llego el paquete incompleto, compré el paquete premium y me vino el chaleco de la perrita con solo 2 velcros y sin el logo.
Excellent service! - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Excellent service. It was fast, easy to use and convenient. Highly recommend.
It's hard to give 5 full stars yet. - by , March 25, 2011
4/ 4stars
Pretty straight forward. Love that you can scan health records and documents into the profile so it's all in one place. Hoping the QR code on the ID takes you straight to profile.
- by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
It is to big for my puppy. But I love it.
Great recommendation - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
It was a great experience. I would recommend it to people in need.
Hot Dog! - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Well hot dignity dog! That was an easy and well worth it process registering my dog as an emotional support animal!
Great quality! - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Fast delivery, high quality, pet approved!!
Loved! High quality! - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Fast delivery, high quality, and look great!! I highly recommend!
Great - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Great and we love it love it love it
You are a good quality - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
The service was easy to use and navigate through I had good quality and merchandise everything I needed for my for baby to help me get started in a new life
Thanks - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
I order and received digital copies same day then few days later everything I ordered was already delivered. Thank you for your service to be able to assist when possible. Thanks again
so easy to register - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
it was super easy to register my moms dog as a emotional support dog for my 87 yr old mom! thank you for offering this service!
Service Dog IDs and Certificate - by , March 25, 2011
5/ 5stars
Very easy and very fast, and great looking.