South Dakota is one of only 19 states with a specific law penalizing ESA housing fraud, with fines up to $1,000 and possible eviction. The state’s 2018 statutes (SDCL 43-32-33 through 43-32-36) govern ESA documentation, target letter mills, and define landlord rights. A May 2026 HUD enforcement memo complicates the picture for untrained ESAs, making South Dakota’s reliance on federal protections riskier than in states with stronger standalone ESA laws. ESAs have no public access rights in South Dakota.
South Dakota has a surprisingly specific set of rules governing emotional support animals. Unlike many states that lean entirely on the federal Fair Housing Act, South Dakota passed its own ESA housing statutes in 2018, complete with documentation standards, anti-fraud provisions, and civil penalties. These laws sit alongside federal protections under the FHA and the state’s own Human Relations Act, creating a layered system that tenants, landlords, and mental health providers all need to understand.
This guide breaks down every key term and concept in South Dakota ESA law, organized so you can find exactly what applies to your situation. Whether you’re a renter preparing to request a reasonable accommodation or a landlord trying to understand your obligations, the definitions below cover the full picture.
An emotional support animal provides comfort, companionship, or emotional relief to a person with a disability. Unlike service animals, ESAs are not trained to perform specific tasks. A dog that calms its owner during panic attacks through its presence (rather than through trained behavior like deep pressure therapy) is an ESA, not a service animal.
Under South Dakota law and the federal FHA, ESAs are classified as “assistance animals,” not pets. This distinction matters because it determines whether housing protections apply. To understand how ESAs differ from service animals, the key question is always whether the animal has been individually trained to perform disability-related tasks.
The ADA defines a service animal narrowly: a dog individually trained to do work or perform tasks directly related to a person’s disability. South Dakota’s own definition under SDCL 43-32-33 is broader. It defines “service animal” to include any animal serving a role for an individual with a disability, covering emotional support animals, therapy animals, and assistance animals. This broad state-level definition was enacted in 2018 and is unique compared to many states that mirror the ADA’s narrower language.
This matters for housing. In the housing context, South Dakota’s definition gives ESAs explicit recognition under state statute, not just federal law.
A psychiatric service dog is individually trained to perform tasks related to a psychiatric disability. Examples include a dog trained to interrupt self-harm behaviors, remind an owner to take medication, or perform grounding techniques during a dissociative episode.
After the May 2026 HUD memo (explained below), PSDs carry significantly stronger federal protection than untrained ESAs. Research on service dogs and PTSD continues to validate their clinical value, and the legal framework now rewards the training distinction more than ever.
A therapy animal is trained to provide comfort to people in institutional settings like hospitals, schools, or nursing homes. Therapy animals have no housing protections under the FHA or South Dakota law. A therapy dog certification does not qualify someone for an ESA housing accommodation.
This is the umbrella term used in FHA guidance. It covers both service animals and ESAs. When you see “assistance animal” in South Dakota statutes or HUD documents, it means any animal that assists a person with a disability, whether through trained tasks or emotional support.
This statute establishes the definitions that the rest of South Dakota’s ESA framework builds on. It defines “disability” as a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, and it defines “service animal” broadly enough to include ESAs. Enacted as Session Law 2018, ch 259, this is where South Dakota formally recognized ESAs at the state level.
If your disability is not apparent or already known to the landlord, South Dakota law allows them to request valid documentation showing you need an ESA. This is the state-level equivalent of the FHA’s documentation framework.
What landlords cannot do: demand details about your diagnosis, ask for medical records, require a specific form, or contact your therapist without permission. They can ask for a letter confirming you have a disability and that the animal provides disability-related support. For a full breakdown of what housing providers are and aren’t allowed to ask for, see this guide on evidence landlords can request.
This is South Dakota’s most distinctive ESA statute. It explicitly bars documentation from providers who “operate solely to provide service or assistance animal certifications.” In plain language, if a provider’s entire business model is churning out ESA letters without conducting real clinical evaluations, their letters don’t satisfy South Dakota’s requirements.
The provision targets websites that sell instant ESA letters with no therapeutic relationship, no clinical assessment, and no ongoing care. South Dakota was ahead of many states in recognizing this problem. Only 19 states have ESA housing fraud laws as of 2026, and South Dakota’s anti-letter-mill language is among the most specific.
What this means practically: your ESA letter needs to come from a licensed mental health professional who has an established therapeutic relationship with you, not from a website that exists solely to sell certifications. Learning how to spot fake ESA letters can save you from eviction and financial penalties.
South Dakota takes ESA fraud seriously. If someone knowingly makes a false claim about having a disability requiring an ESA, or knowingly provides fraudulent documentation, the landlord can evict the tenant and collect damages up to $1,000. This applies to both tenants who fabricate disabilities and providers who issue bogus letters.
Separately, misrepresenting an animal as a service animal in public places is a Class 2 misdemeanor in South Dakota, carrying up to 30 days in jail and a $500 fine. This criminal penalty applies to public access situations, not housing.
The federal FHA (42 U.S.C. 3601-3619) requires housing providers to make reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities. This includes allowing ESAs in housing with no-pet policies and prohibiting pet fees or deposits for ESAs. The FHA covers most housing in South Dakota, with narrow exceptions.
South Dakota ESA laws layer on top of the FHA rather than replacing it. Tenants get whichever protection is stronger in a given situation.
This state law parallels the FHA at the state level. Under SDCL 20-13-23.7, housing providers must make good faith efforts to provide reasonable accommodations for disabled persons unless doing so would cause undue hardship. The South Dakota Division of Human Rights administers this law, providing a state-level complaint path that operates independently of federal HUD enforcement.
This independence becomes critically important after the 2026 HUD memo.
In the housing context, a reasonable accommodation is a change to rules, policies, or practices that allows a person with a disability equal opportunity to use and enjoy their home. Allowing an ESA in a no-pet building is the textbook example. The accommodation must be connected to the person’s disability, and the request must be supported by documentation when the disability isn’t obvious.
Students at South Dakota universities (SDSU, USD, Augustana) can submit ESA letters to campus disability services to request housing accommodations in dormitories, since college housing is covered under these same frameworks.
A landlord’s no-pet policy does not apply to ESAs with proper documentation. Under both the FHA and South Dakota law, an ESA is not a pet. Breed restrictions, weight limits, and species restrictions in pet policies generally cannot be applied to documented ESAs either, though landlords retain the right to deny animals that pose a direct threat or would cause substantial damage.
Landlords cannot charge pet fees, pet rent, or pet deposits for ESAs. They can, however, charge for actual damage caused by the animal, just as they could charge any tenant for property damage. This is a common point of confusion and conflict. If you’re dealing with a landlord trying to charge pet fees, this guide on how to avoid pet fees legally walks through the specifics.
A landlord can legally deny an ESA if the animal poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others that cannot be reduced or eliminated through reasonable measures. This must be based on objective evidence (actual behavior, not breed stereotypes) and assessed individually. A dog that has bitten someone could be denied. A pit bull mix with no history of aggression cannot be denied on breed alone.
In one real-world case, a Colorado HOA paid $50,000 after refusing to allow an emotional support animal without legitimate grounds. These enforcement actions demonstrate that denial without proper justification carries real financial risk for housing providers.
The FHA does not cover owner-occupied buildings with four or fewer units. In these situations, the landlord is not required to accommodate an ESA. South Dakota follows this federal exemption. If your landlord lives in the building and there are four or fewer total units, South Dakota ESA laws may not protect you.
An ESA letter is a document from a licensed mental health professional stating that you have a disability and that your emotional support animal provides disability-related benefit. In South Dakota, a valid letter must include:
The provider’s name, license number, and state of licensure
Confirmation that you have a disability under federal or state definitions
A nexus statement connecting your disability to the need for the ESA
The provider’s professional letterhead
The date of issuance
Letters should be renewed annually. Landlords in South Dakota can request current, valid documentation, and an expired letter won’t satisfy the requirement. For details on what a properly formatted letter looks like, see this breakdown of what therapists should include.
A “letter mill” is an operation that exists primarily or exclusively to produce ESA certification letters, with no real clinical evaluation. Under SDCL 43-32-35, letters from these providers do not meet South Dakota’s documentation standard. Red flags include: instant approval without a clinical conversation, no follow-up care, no verifiable license, and prices that seem designed for volume rather than clinical rigor.
In South Dakota, an LMHP who can write an ESA letter includes licensed psychologists, licensed professional counselors, licensed clinical social workers, psychiatrists, and other providers authorized to diagnose and treat mental health conditions under state law. The provider must be licensed in a jurisdiction that allows them to practice with South Dakota residents.
South Dakota’s anti-letter-mill provision implicitly requires an established therapeutic relationship. This means the provider must have conducted a genuine clinical evaluation, not just reviewed a one-page online form. The relationship doesn’t need to be years long, but it must involve actual assessment and clinical judgment about whether you have a qualifying disability and whether an ESA would provide meaningful support.
Under South Dakota’s 2018 law, fraudulent documentation includes ESA letters from online registries or “certification databases” (no official ESA registry exists), letters from out-of-state providers who operate solely to certify animals without established therapeutic relationships, and any documentation where the tenant knowingly misrepresents their disability status. You can verify a clinician’s license to ensure your letter will hold up.
ESAs have no public access rights in South Dakota. Restaurants, stores, hotels, and other public accommodations are not required to admit emotional support animals. Only service animals (and service animals in training under SDCL 20-13-23.2) have public access protections. This is one of the most commonly misunderstood aspects of South Dakota ESA laws.
Since January 2021, the U.S. Department of Transportation no longer requires airlines to accommodate ESAs in the cabin for free. ESAs are treated as pets for airline purposes. Psychiatric service dogs, because they are trained service animals, still fly under DOT service animal rules.
Workplace ESA accommodations are handled case by case under the South Dakota Human Relations Act and, at the federal level, the ADA. There is no automatic right to bring an ESA to work. An employee would need to request a reasonable accommodation and demonstrate that the ESA is necessary for a qualifying disability.
On May 22, 2026, the Trump administration’s HUD issued an enforcement guidance memo that fundamentally shifted the federal agency’s approach to untrained emotional support animals. The memo permanently canceled both the 2013 and 2020 HUD guidance documents that had protected ESAs under the Fair Housing Act.
The practical effect: HUD will no longer pursue Fair Housing Act complaints on behalf of tenants whose ESAs have not been individually trained to perform disability-related work or tasks.
What this means for South Dakota specifically. This state has relied heavily on the federal FHA framework. South Dakota’s own ESA statutes (SDCL 43-32-33 through 43-32-36) focus primarily on documentation standards and fraud penalties rather than independently establishing broad housing protections for ESAs. That makes the loss of HUD enforcement more consequential here than in states with strong standalone ESA housing protections.
What did NOT change. The Fair Housing Act itself was not amended. Congress did not act, and no court has ruled that ESAs are excluded from housing protections. The HUD memo is internal enforcement guidance, not new law. As HUD itself acknowledged, it intends to engage in future rulemaking, but no regulation currently exists.
The state-level path still works. Complaints filed through the South Dakota Division of Human Rights are not affected by this federal memo. The state’s Human Relations Act independently requires reasonable accommodations in housing.
Psychiatric service dogs are unaffected. A PSD, individually trained to perform a disability-related task, still meets the standard HUD now applies. For anyone considering the investment, a PSD offers more durable legal protection going forward. You can explore psychiatric service dog costs to understand what that path involves.
Category | ESA | Service Animal | Psychiatric Service Dog |
|---|---|---|---|
Training required | No | Yes, task-trained | Yes, task-trained for psychiatric disability |
Housing protection (state) | Yes, under SDCL 43-32-33 | Yes | Yes |
Housing protection (federal HUD enforcement) | Uncertain after May 2026 memo | Yes | Yes |
Public access in SD | No | Yes | Yes |
Air travel | No (treated as pet since 2021) | Yes, under DOT rules | Yes, under DOT rules |
Documentation required | ESA letter from LMHP | None required by ADA | ESA/PSD letter for housing; DOT form for travel |
Fraud penalties in SD | Up to $1,000 + eviction | Class 2 misdemeanor for misrepresentation | Same as service animal |
If a landlord violates your ESA housing rights, you can file a complaint with the South Dakota Division of Human Rights at (605) 773-4493. This state-level path is unaffected by the 2026 HUD memo and applies the South Dakota Human Relations Act’s reasonable accommodation standard.
You can also file a complaint with HUD at (800) 669-9777. However, after the May 2026 memo, HUD’s willingness to pursue complaints involving untrained ESAs is uncertain. Complaints involving psychiatric service dogs or other trained assistance animals should proceed normally through HUD.
You may file a private lawsuit in federal court within 2 years of the alleged discrimination. This option exists independently of both the state and federal administrative complaint processes.
South Dakota has nine tribal-nation reservations, including Pine Ridge, Rosebud, Cheyenne River, and Standing Rock. Housing on these reservations operates under tribal sovereignty frameworks layered with federal FHA coverage. The interaction between tribal housing authority rules and federal ESA protections can be complex, and tenants on reservations should consult with legal aid organizations familiar with both systems.
South Dakota law and the FHA allow denial in several situations: the documentation is fraudulent or from an unlicensed provider, the tenant refuses to provide proper documentation when the disability isn’t apparent, the animal poses a verified direct threat, the animal would cause substantial property damage, the accommodation would impose undue financial or administrative burden, or the small landlord exemption applies. For more detail on what counts as a legitimate reason to deny an ESA, that linked guide covers each scenario.
No. Under both the FHA and South Dakota law, ESAs are not pets. Landlords cannot charge pet deposits, pet fees, or pet rent for a properly documented emotional support animal. They can charge for actual damage the animal causes, same as any other property damage.
No. There is no official ESA registry in South Dakota or at the federal level. Any website claiming to “register” your ESA is not providing a legally required or recognized service. What South Dakota law requires is a valid ESA letter from a licensed mental health professional with an established therapeutic relationship.
Under SDCL 43-32-36, knowingly providing fraudulent ESA documentation or falsely claiming a disability can result in eviction and civil damages up to $1,000. South Dakota is one of only 19 states with this kind of specific fraud penalty. The consequences are real and enforceable.
Yes, but only for specific, legally recognized reasons. These include fraudulent documentation, a direct threat to safety that can’t be mitigated, substantial property damage risk, undue hardship on the housing provider, or the small landlord exemption (owner-occupied buildings with four or fewer units). A landlord cannot deny your ESA simply because they don’t like animals or have a general no-pet policy.
Yes. ESA letters should be renewed annually. South Dakota landlords can request current documentation, and an expired letter will not satisfy the requirement. Maintaining an active therapeutic relationship with your provider makes renewal straightforward.
Potentially, yes. The FHA does not limit tenants to one ESA, but each animal must be supported by documentation showing it provides distinct disability-related benefit. A landlord can request separate documentation for each animal, and the standard for reasonableness applies to each one individually.
No. ESAs are not permitted in restaurants, stores, or other public accommodations in South Dakota. Only ADA-defined service animals and service animals in training (under SDCL 20-13-23.2) have public access rights. This is a housing-only protection.
You have three options: file with the South Dakota Division of Human Rights at (605) 773-4493, file with HUD at (800) 669-9777, or pursue a private lawsuit in federal court within two years. After the May 2026 HUD memo, the state-level complaint path through the Division of Human Rights may be the most reliable option for untrained ESA disputes.
Copyright © 2020 USA Service Dog. All rights reserved.
